gtm.help

Channels

Finding content gaps your competitors haven't covered

A method for finding content topics competitors haven't covered well, using free tools and manual review. Where the real gaps usually hide.

  • 3 August 2026
  • Free to read
  • No signup

Add your website — see your ranked plan in about a minute, free.

Short answer

How do I find content gaps my competitors haven't covered?

The most useful gaps aren't missing topics — they're topics competitors cover badly: outdated posts, generic advice with no numbers, or comparison pages that dodge honest weaknesses. Check your top 3-5 competitors' blogs directly, note what's thin or dated, then check your own Search Console for near-miss rankings you could expand. This manual process takes 3-4 hours and surfaces better opportunities than a keyword gap tool alone.

Last updated 3 August 2026

Where content gaps typically hide
Gap typeHow to find itEffortOpportunity size
Outdated competitor posts (old stats, dead screenshots)Manual review of top-ranking pages1-2 hoursMedium-high
Topics with no direct competitor coverageFree keyword gap tools (Ubersuggest) + manual search1 hourVariable
Generic advice missing real numbersRead top 5 results for your key terms1 hourHigh
Questions answered in forums but not on any company blogSearch Reddit/forums for your topic + 'reddit'1 hourMedium-high
Your own near-miss rankings (pos 11-20)Search Console30 minHigh, fast to act on

Do this

The steps, in order.

  1. Step 1

    Read your top 5 competitors' 10 best-performing posts, not their whole blog

    Use a free tool like Ubersuggest to find their top pages by estimated traffic, then actually read them. Note where the content is generic, outdated, or avoids the harder parts of the question — these are your openings.

  2. Step 2

    Search your core topics with 'reddit' or 'forum' appended

    This surfaces real discussions where people ask the question your competitors haven't properly answered on their sites. A well-answered version of a genuinely unresolved forum question often becomes a strong-ranking page because no company content currently satisfies that intent.

  3. Step 3

    Check your own Search Console for topics you already rank for weakly

    A page ranking at position 15 for a term related to a gap you've identified is faster to fix than starting a new page from zero, since it already has some indexing history and relevance signal.

  4. Step 4

    Note where competitors avoid the honest, harder answer

    Many competitor comparison pages and pricing posts are vague specifically to avoid an uncomfortable truth (a real price, a real limitation). Being the page that actually answers the specific number or trade-off often outperforms a more general competitor post over time.

  5. Step 5

    Prioritise gaps by how close they are to a buying decision

    A content gap in a bottom-funnel topic (pricing, comparison, implementation) is worth pursuing before a gap in a broad educational topic, even if the educational gap looks larger on a keyword tool, because it converts at a higher rate per visitor.

Worth knowing

The bits people get wrong.

Most 'content gap' advice focuses on keyword tools that compare which terms competitors rank for that you don't. This is useful as a starting list, but it misses the more valuable gap type: topics everyone covers, but covers poorly. A keyword gap tool can't tell you a competitor's post is three years old with dead links and vague advice — only reading it can.

Forums and community sites (Reddit, niche Slack or Discord communities, industry-specific forums) are an underused source because company blogs rarely answer questions with the same specificity and honesty as a real person answering a stranger for free. Translating a good forum answer into a properly structured, SEO-accessible page is one of the more reliable ways to fill a genuine gap.

The competitive advantage of specificity compounds: a page that names real prices, real trade-offs, and real numbers where competitors stay vague tends to earn more organic backlinks and shares over time, because it's the page other people actually want to reference when discussing the topic.

Don't confuse 'competitors haven't covered this' with 'this is worth covering'. Some gaps exist because the topic has genuinely low value or interest, not because everyone missed an opportunity. Cross-check any gap against actual search volume and buyer relevance before committing writing time to it.

Questions

Follow-up questions.

Do I need a paid tool like Ahrefs to find content gaps properly?

A paid tool speeds up the keyword-overlap comparison across many competitors at once, but the manual review — actually reading competitor content for weaknesses — matters more and is free regardless of tooling.

How many competitors should I analyse for content gaps?

Three to five direct competitors is usually enough to spot patterns without the exercise taking over a week. Analysing ten or more mostly adds diminishing returns and repeated findings.

Should I copy a competitor's content structure if I find a gap?

Use their structure as a reference for what a thorough answer should cover, but write your own version with your own examples, numbers and opinion. A close structural copy without added value doesn't out-rank the original and risks looking derivative.

How often should I redo this content gap analysis?

Every 3-6 months is enough for most small businesses, since competitor content and search intent shift slowly. Redo it sooner if a competitor launches a major content push or if your own rankings drop unexpectedly on core topics.

Get started

Want this answered for your business?

Paste your URL and you'll get a ranked plan, costed in hours and dollars, in about a minute.

Add your website and see your own ranked plan.