Cold email
Lemlist vs Woodpecker
Lemlist is the better fit if your sequences mix email with LinkedIn steps and you want personalisation gimmicks that still work. Woodpecker suits teams who send plain text from a few inboxes and care mainly about not emailing someone twice.
- No affiliate links
- Public pricing only
- Updated by hand
Add your website — see your ranked plan in about a minute, free.
PREVIEW FREE — NO CARD7-DAY TRIAL — CARD TO START
Lemlist or Woodpecker — which should you use?
Lemlist is the better fit if your sequences mix email with LinkedIn steps and you want personalisation gimmicks that still work. Woodpecker suits teams who send plain text from a few inboxes and care mainly about not emailing someone twice. Lemlist starts at From roughly $39 per user per month (free tier: Free plan is limited; a trial covers most evaluation.); Woodpecker starts at From roughly $49/month at low sending volumes (free tier: No free plan; trial available.). Prices are list prices and change, so check the vendor pages before buying.
Last updated 3 August 2026
These two have been around far longer than the current crop of unlimited-inbox tools, and it shows in the details: both have mature reply detection, both integrate with the usual CRMs, and both charge per sending seat rather than per mailbox.
That per-seat pricing is the catch. If your plan is fifty domains and hundreds of mailboxes, look at Instantly or Smartlead instead — these two are built for smaller, more careful sending.
Side by side
Lemlist and Woodpecker in short.
Lemlist
Multichannel sequences with email, LinkedIn steps, calls and personalised images or landing pages.
- Free
- Free plan is limited; a trial covers most evaluation.
- Paid from
- From roughly $39 per user per month
Good at
- LinkedIn steps and calls sit in the same sequence as email
- Personalised images and dynamic landing pages, which still lift reply rates when used sparingly
- Its own contact database is bundled on higher tiers
Weak at
- Priced per user, so scaling volume gets expensive
- Feature surface is wide enough that new users overbuild sequences
Woodpecker
Straightforward cold email with strong duplicate and reply protection, popular with agencies.
- Free
- No free plan; trial available.
- Paid from
- From roughly $49/month at low sending volumes
Good at
- Cheapest of the mature tools at small volumes
- Reply and duplicate detection across a whole team, so two reps never hit the same company
- Agency panel for managing client campaigns
Weak at
- Multichannel is thin next to Lemlist
- The interface looks its age
The differences
Where they actually diverge.
| Feature | Lemlist | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn steps | Yes, native | Limited |
| Personalised images | Yes | No |
| Pricing model | Per user | Per slot or contact, by volume |
| Agency panel | Yes | Yes |
| Best at | Multichannel sequences | Clean, deduplicated plain-text email |
Pick one
Which one fits you.
Choose Lemlist if
- Your sequence needs a LinkedIn touch between emails
- You sell something visual and personalised images earn their keep
- You want a bundled contact database
Choose Woodpecker if
- You send modest volume and want the lowest sensible bill
- Several reps prospect the same market and duplicates are a real risk
- Plain text out of a real inbox is your whole strategy
When neither is the answer
If you need dozens of rotating mailboxes, both will price you out. That's what the unlimited-inbox tools exist for.
Questions
Common questions.
Do personalised images still work?
Less than they did in 2019. They lift replies when the image proves you looked at the prospect's site, and they hurt when they're an obvious template with a logo dropped in. Test on a hundred contacts before rolling out.
Which is safer for deliverability?
Neither is inherently safer. Volume per mailbox, domain age and reply rate matter far more than the sender you choose.
Prices are list prices published by each vendor and change often — check the linked pricing pages before you buy. We take no affiliate commission and nobody pays to appear here.
Related elsewhere on gtm.help
Ad Copy Generator
Copy for Google, Meta and LinkedIn ads
AnswerAre LinkedIn ads worth it for a small B2B company?
LinkedIn ads usually only make sense for B2B companies with an average deal size above roughly $3,000-5,000, because co…
Tool guideBest cold email tools for early-stage startups
Six tools, honest pricing, and the deliverability rules that matter more than the tool you pick.
PlaybookInstagram growth plan for an ecommerce store
Followers don't pay invoices. This plan optimises for traffic and add-to-carts, with follower growth as a side effect.
Elsewhere on gtm.help
Keep exploring.
Free marketing tools
Calculators and generators that run without a signup.
BrowseGrowth playbooks
Step-by-step plans by industry and goal.
BrowseTool guides
What to use, what it costs, when it earns its keep.
BrowseMarketing checklists
Task lists by business type and competitive situation.
BrowseStraight answers
The growth questions founders ask, answered with numbers.
Browsegtm.help
Skip the tool research. Get the plan first.
Paste your website and gtm.help reads it, then writes a ranked growth plan for your business — with the tools each task needs, what they cost, and what to do first. Seven days free.
Add your website and judge it on your own plan.